Singh

Singh v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 202423-1292California1,496 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SURINDER SINGH, No. 23-1292 Agency No. Petitioner, A216-276-002 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 16, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: CALLAHAN, KOH, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge KOH.

Surinder Singh (Petitioner), a native and citizen of India, petitions for review

of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order dismissing his appeal of an

Immigration Judge’s (IJ) decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). He claims

that the BIA’s decision was clearly erroneous…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.