Kirti Mehta v. Victoria Partners

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 202423-15244California831 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KIRTI MEHTA, No. 23-15244

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-01493-CDS-VCF

v.

MEMORANDUM*

VICTORIA PARTNERS, doing business as Park-Mgm Casino & Hotel Operator; ANN

HOFF; LONDON SWINNEY; MGM

INTERNATIONAL; BILL HORNBUCKER;

TERRENCE LANNI; JOSEPH A. CARBO,

Jr.; RYAN GUADIZ; PAUL SALEM;

TRAVIS LUNN; NIKLAS

RYTTERSTROM; BRANDON DARDEAU;

CLIVE HAWKINS; CHUCK BOWLING;

ANTON NIKODEMUS,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Cristina D. Silva, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 17, 2024**

Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Kirti Mehta appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his

action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.