Etuate Sekona v. F. Custino

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 202423-15848California482 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ETUATE SEKONA, No. 23-15848

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-00517-TLN-DMC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

F. CUSTINO, Correctional Officer, Mule

Creek State Prison; F. ANGLE, Correctional Officer, Mule Creek State Prison; L. SNOW, Correctional Officer, Mule Creek State Prison; J. CHARON, Lieutenant, Mule Creek State Prison,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 17, 2024**

Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Etuate Sekona appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims arising from injuries he

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.