Etuate Sekona v. F. Custino
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 202423-15848California482 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 23 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ETUATE SEKONA, No. 23-15848
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-00517-TLN-DMC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
F. CUSTINO, Correctional Officer, Mule
Creek State Prison; F. ANGLE, Correctional Officer, Mule Creek State Prison; L. SNOW, Correctional Officer, Mule Creek State Prison; J. CHARON, Lieutenant, Mule Creek State Prison,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 17, 2024**
Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Etuate Sekona appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims arising from injuries he
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…