Ernesto Zaragosa-Solis v. M. Gutierrez
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 202423-15165California254 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 23 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ERNESTO ZARAGOSA-SOLIS, No. 23-15165
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:23-cv-00011-JCH-LCK
v.
MEMORANDUM*
M. GUTIERREZ, Warden,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John C. Hinderaker, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 17, 2024**
Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Ernesto Zaragosa-Solis appeals pro se from the district court’s order
dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C § 1291. Reviewing de novo, see Stephens v.
Herrera, 464 F.3d 895, 897 (9th Cir. 2006), we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court determined that Zaragosa-Solis’s § 2241 petition…