Ernesto Zaragosa-Solis v. M. Gutierrez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 202423-15165California254 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERNESTO ZARAGOSA-SOLIS, No. 23-15165

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:23-cv-00011-JCH-LCK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

M. GUTIERREZ, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John C. Hinderaker, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 17, 2024**

Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Ernesto Zaragosa-Solis appeals pro se from the district court’s order

dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C § 1291. Reviewing de novo, see Stephens v.

Herrera, 464 F.3d 895, 897 (9th Cir. 2006), we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court determined that Zaragosa-Solis’s § 2241 petition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.