Daniel Wilson v. Bullhead City Police Department

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 202423-15468California258 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL RAE WILSON, No. 23-15468

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-08118-DLR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

BULLHEAD CITY POLICE

DEPARTMENT; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 17, 2024**

Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Daniel Rae Wilson appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Fourth Amendment excessive

force claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

district court’s summary judgment and qualified immunity determination. Furnace

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). v. Sullivan, 705 F.3d 1021, 1026 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.