Daniel Wilson v. Bullhead City Police Department
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 202423-15468California258 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 23 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANIEL RAE WILSON, No. 23-15468
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-08118-DLR
v.
MEMORANDUM*
BULLHEAD CITY POLICE
DEPARTMENT; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 17, 2024**
Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Daniel Rae Wilson appeals pro se from the district court’s summary
judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Fourth Amendment excessive
force claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a
district court’s summary judgment and qualified immunity determination. Furnace
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). v. Sullivan, 705 F.3d 1021, 1026 (9th Cir.…