Clifton Williams, Jr. v. People of the State of California

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 202423-15454California285 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CLIFTON WILLIAMS, Jr., No. 23-15454

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:22-cv-00032-AWI-BAM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA; COUNTY OF

STANISLAUS DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S

OFFICE; P. HOGAN; PUBLIC

DEFENDER’S OFFICE,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 17, 2024**

Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Clifton Williams, Jr. appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the

district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.