Carina Conerly v. Sharif Tarpin
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 23 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CARINA CONERLY; JAMES CONERLY; No. 23-15297 MARILYN TILLMAN-CONERLY; M. T., a minor, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01525-TLN-CKD
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
MEMORANDUM*
v.
SHARIF R. TARPIN, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 17, 2024**
Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Carina Conerly, James Conerly, and Marilyn Tillman-Conerly appeal pro se
from the district court’s judgment dismissing their action alleging federal claims.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Puri v. Khalsa,
844 F.3d 1152, 1157 (9th Cir. 2017) (dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…