Rivera

Rivera v. Superior Court

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 2024B334522California1,990 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/23/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

ISAI LOPEZ RIVERA et al., 2d Civil No. B334522 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2022- Plaintiffs and Petitioners, 00568507-CU-BC-VTA) (Ventura County) v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

VENTURA COUNTY,

Respondent;

FORD MOTOR COMPANY,

Real Party in Interest.

Third parties often benefit from a provision in a contract between other parties. But such benefit alone, does not mean a contract was made to benefit third parties. Petitioners Isai Lopez Rivera and Helen Espinosa brought this action under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Civ. Code, § 1790 et seq.), known as the “lemon law,” after repeated attempts to repair their Ford truck failed. They named real party in interest Ford Motor Co. (FMC) and Ford of Ventura, Inc. as defendants. FMC manufactured the truck. Ford of Ventura is the authorized service center that attempted the repairs. Petitioners did not name the selling dealer as a defendant. FMC moved to compel arbitration based on a provision in the sale contract between petitioners and the non-party dealer. The trial court granted the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.