Daniel McNab v. Gavin Newsom
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 24, 202423-55419California319 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 24 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANIEL MCNAB, No. 23-55419
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:22-cv-00843-DSF-E
v.
MEMORANDUM*
GAVIN NEWSOM,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 24, 2024**
Before: FERNANDEZ, KLEINFELD, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Daniel McNab appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that California Governor Gavin Newsom
violated his constitutional right to equal protection through state government
orders issued in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We review de novo a
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissal for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of…