Jerome Grimes v. Sr Towing
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 24, 202423-55251California293 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 24 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JEROME L. GRIMES, No. 23-55251
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-01033-LL-BLM
v.
MEMORANDUM*
SR TOWING,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Linda Lopez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 17, 2024**
Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Jerome L. Grimes appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action alleging deprivation of his personal property. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a sua sponte dismissal for
lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3).
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Carolina Cas. Ins. Co. v. Team Equip., Inc., 741 F.3d…