Jerome Grimes v. Sr Towing

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 24, 202423-55251California293 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEROME L. GRIMES, No. 23-55251

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-01033-LL-BLM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

SR TOWING,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Linda Lopez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 17, 2024**

Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Jerome L. Grimes appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging deprivation of his personal property. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a sua sponte dismissal for

lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Carolina Cas. Ins. Co. v. Team Equip., Inc., 741 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.