Charles Farnsworth v. Teddi Armstrong
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 24, 202423-35253California418 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 24 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHARLES V. FARNSWORTH, No. 23-35253
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-05007-MJP
v.
MEMORANDUM*
TEDDI ARMSTRONG; JACKIE
BRENNAN; BRUCE C. GAGE, Doctor;
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT
OF CORRECTIONS; FIVE UNKNOWN
HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 17, 2024**
Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Washington state prisoner Charles V. Farnsworth appeals pro se from the
district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under…