Charles Farnsworth v. Teddi Armstrong

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 24, 202423-35253California418 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHARLES V. FARNSWORTH, No. 23-35253

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-05007-MJP

v.

MEMORANDUM*

TEDDI ARMSTRONG; JACKIE

BRENNAN; BRUCE C. GAGE, Doctor;

WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS; FIVE UNKNOWN

HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 17, 2024**

Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Washington state prisoner Charles V. Farnsworth appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.