Usfs

Oregon Wild v. Usfs

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 25, 202423-35579California1,622 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 25 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OREGON WILD, an Oregon nonprofit No. 23-35579 corporation; WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a New Mexico nonprofit corporation, D.C. No. 1:22-cv-01007-MC

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted September 11, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and R. COLLINS,** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Raner C. Collins, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. Oregon Wild and WildEarth Guardians (collectively “Wild”) appeal the

district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the United States Forest

Service, Michael Ramsey, Jeannette Wilson, Randy Moore, and Thomas Vilsack

(collectively the “Forest…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.