Campbell

Campbell v. Sunshine Behavioral Health

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 2024G062886California4,644 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS

Sunshine employed Campbell as an hourly, nonexempt worker from approximately October 2018 to March 2019. Sunshine contends that when Campbell began her employment, she signed an arbitration agreement that included a class action waiver. On May 23, 2022, Campbell, as the lead plaintiff in a putative class action, filed the instant complaint. The complaint alleged a single cause of action for violations of Business and Professions Code section 17200, et seq., based on violations of employment law. Among other things, the

We offer no opinion as to whether the arbitration agreement

Sunshine alleged Campbell signed was valid or enforceable. This issue was never reached by the trial court.

2 complaint alleged employees had not been paid proper overtime compensation, had been required to work through meal and rest breaks without compensation, had not been paid minimum wage, and had not been paid in a timely manner. Sunshine filed an answer on August 3, 2022. The answer included an affirmative defense that “one or more of the putative class members” signed an arbitration agreement that precluded them from participation. Later that month, Campbell served certain discovery…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.