People v. Prudnikov CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 2024C099129California4,949 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/25/24 P. v. Prudnikov CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C099129

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 21FE003491)

v.

ANDREY PRUDNIKOV,

Defendant and Appellant.

After a jury trial, defendant Andrey Prudnikov was convicted of two counts of raping Haley Doe. On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence of one of his convictions, contends the trial court erred in failing to provide a lesser included instruction, and claims his consecutive sentence on count two was unauthorized. He further requests we modify the criminal protective order issued at the time of sentencing. We shall modify the judgment to impose the consecutive sentence on the forcible…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.