Stacie Cassel v. Martin O'Malley

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 25, 202423-55402California733 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 25 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STACIE MARIE CASSEL, No. 23-55402

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-05335-SP

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Sheri Pym, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted September 12, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

After finding that Stacie Cassel was no longer disabled, the Social Security

Administration terminated her disability benefits. The district court affirmed.

Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we do the same.

We review the district court’s decision de novo, and we affirm the agency’s

denial of benefits if it is free from legal error and supported by substantial

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. evidence. Stiffler v. O’Malley, 102…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.