Stacie Cassel v. Martin O'Malley
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 25, 202423-55402California733 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 25 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STACIE MARIE CASSEL, No. 23-55402
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-05335-SP
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Sheri Pym, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted September 12, 2024 Pasadena, California
Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
After finding that Stacie Cassel was no longer disabled, the Social Security
Administration terminated her disability benefits. The district court affirmed.
Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we do the same.
We review the district court’s decision de novo, and we affirm the agency’s
denial of benefits if it is free from legal error and supported by substantial
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. evidence. Stiffler v. O’Malley, 102…