ProcureNet Limited v. Twitter CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 2024A168426California4,306 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 9/25/24 ProcureNet Limited v. Twitter CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

PROCURENET LIMITED et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,

A168426

v. TWITTER, INC. et al., (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. CGC23605843) Defendants and Appellants.

Plaintiffs ProcureNet Limited and Gurbaksh Chahal sued Twitter, Inc. and X Corp. (Twitter) for breach of contract. Plaintiffs alleged that they established accounts on Twitter’s online platform, and paid Twitter over $1 million under contracts for advertising to promote the accounts, and that Twitter breached the covenant of good faith and fair dealing implied in the advertising contracts by suspending their online accounts “without adequate justification,” thus depriving plaintiffs of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.