Meza-Moras

United States v. Meza-Moras

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 25, 202424-2436California227 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 25 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-2436 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:21-cr-01400-JAS-JR-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

ELIDIO MEZA-MORAS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James A. Soto, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 17, 2024 **

Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Elidio Meza-Moras appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the revocation of supervised release and eight-month sentence imposed

upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Meza-

Moras’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.