Bath

Bath v. State of Cal. CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 2024A167908California8,918 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 9/25/24 Bath v. State of Cal. CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

AZEEM BATH et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

A167908

v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., (Solano County Super. Ct. No. FCS058670) Defendants and Respondents.

Plaintiffs are employees of the State of California who provide dental care to inmates in the state prison system; their employment is governed by a memorandum of understanding (MOU). Plaintiffs have sued the state and related defendants seeking compensation for time they have spent on “pre- and post-shift safety and security activities,” such as going through security and picking up and returning alarm devices. Defendants filed a demurrer, which the trial court sustained without leave to amend on the ground these…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.