Perez

Perez v. R.M.T. Contracting CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 2024F086606California8,440 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/26/24 Perez v. R.M.T. Contracting CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

ANGEL PEREZ et al.,

F086606

Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Super. Ct. No. BCV-22-101657) v.

R.M.T. CONTRACTING, INC., OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. Bernard C. Barmann, Jr., Judge. Belden Blaine Raytis, T. Scott Belden, Kaleb L. Judy, and Tyler D. Anthony for Defendant and Appellant. Lavi & Ebrahimian, Joseph Lavi, Jordan D. Bello, Vincent Granberry, and Will Tran for Plaintiffs and Respondents. -ooOoo- Defendant R.M.T. Contracting, Inc. (R.M.T.), a labor contractor, appeals from an order of the Kern County Superior Court denying its motion to compel arbitration. R.M.T. contends the superior…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.