Sullivan

Sullivan v. Luna

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 26, 202424-339California392 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 26 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEMITRIS SULLIVAN, No. 24-339 D.C. No. 2:22-cv-07910-JWH-MAA Petitioner - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

ROBERT G. LUNA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John W. Holcomb, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 17, 2024**

Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Demitris Sullivan appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing

without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We dismiss for lack of

jurisdiction.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Sullivan’s counsel

has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.