Zamora

United States v. Zamora

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 26, 202423-1618California1,074 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 26 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1618 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:20-cr-00160-RMP-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERCED ZAMORA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Rosanna Malouf Peterson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted September 13, 2024 Seattle, Washington

Before: W. FLETCHER and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF, District Judge.**

Defendant-Appellant Merced Zamora appeals the district court’s denial of

several motions related to his criminal trial. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. On the final day of trial, Zamora argued for the first time that Count Three

of the superseding indictment should be dismissed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.