Bartels

United States v. Bartels

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 26, 202423-1555California942 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 26 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1555

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:18-cr-00006-RSM-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JAMIE BARTELS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ricardo S. Martinez, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted September 13, 2024 Seattle, Washington

Before: W. FLETCHER and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF,** District Judge.

Jamie Bartels challenges the district court’s order of restitution of the lost

wages of his minor victim’s mother under 18 U.S.C. § 2259. This Court reviews the

legality of a restitution order de novo. See United States v. Terabelian, 105 F.4th

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. 1207, 1213 (9th Cir. 2024). We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.