Bartels
United States v. Bartels
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 26, 202423-1555California942 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 26 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1555
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:18-cr-00006-RSM-
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JAMIE BARTELS,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ricardo S. Martinez, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted September 13, 2024 Seattle, Washington
Before: W. FLETCHER and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF,** District Judge.
Jamie Bartels challenges the district court’s order of restitution of the lost
wages of his minor victim’s mother under 18 U.S.C. § 2259. This Court reviews the
legality of a restitution order de novo. See United States v. Terabelian, 105 F.4th
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. 1207, 1213 (9th Cir. 2024). We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C.…