Uberti

Uberti v. Farias CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 2024A167364California3,153 words

Opinion

Opinion

Desautels, J.

Filed 9/30/24 Uberti v. Farias CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

GEORGE UBERTI,

Petitioner and Appellant,

A167364

v. NANCY FARIAS as Director, etc., et (Sonoma County Super. Ct. al., No. SCV267704) Respondents.

George Uberti appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for administrative mandate. The petition sought to set aside a decision by the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (Board) that upheld the denial of Uberti’s claim for unemployment benefits.1 We affirm the trial court’s denial of Uberti’s petition.

1 Uberti also sued Nancy Farias in her official capacity as the director

of the Employment Development Department (EDD), the agency that originally…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.