M. R. A. v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 1, 202423-2596California2,084 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 1 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
M.R.A.1, No. 23-2596 Agency No. Petitioner, A246-516-332 v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted September 11, 2024 San Francisco, California
Before: WARDLAW, GOULD, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges. Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge BUMATAY.
M.R.A., a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of the
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) negative reasonable fear determination. The IJ
concurred in the asylum officer’s determination that M.R.A. was credible but
concluded that M.R.A failed to establish a reasonable possibility of persecution or
1 Petitioner requested, and the Government does not oppose, that we refer to him by his initials in this disposition. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. torture if removed to…