People v. Frias CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 1, 2024B336151California1,256 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

In 2011, a jury convicted appellant Andres Frias of first degree murder and found true that he committed the offense for the benefit of a gang and a principal in the crime discharged a firearm causing great bodily injury and death. (§§ 187, subd. (a); 186.22, subd. (b)(1)(C); 12022.53, subd. (d). The trial court sentenced Frias to 50 years to life in prison for the murder and enhancements. On May 27, 2022, Frias filed a petition for resentencing pursuant to section 11790.95 (now renumbered 1172.6). Frias was represented by counsel. The People filed a response, arguing Frias was ineligible for relief because the jury was not instructed on a theory of liability now invalid under Senate Bill No. 1437 and because he was prosecuted as the actual killer. The jury instructions were attached as Exhibit 4 to the People’s response. Frias filed a reply, conceding that the jury instructions did not assert a now invalid theory of liability, but arguing nonetheless that the record of conviction did not show ineligibility for relief as a matter of law. On October 19, 2023, the trial court denied the petition, finding that the jury instructions and verdicts showed Frias had not been…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.