Marriage of O'Hill CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 1, 2024G062146California3,158 words

Opinion

Opinion

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Andi filed the present dissolution proceeding in April 2017. At that time, the parties had three minor children (one of whom is now an adult). On February 18, 2018, Andi filed a request for order (“RFO”) for child support, spousal support, and an award of attorney fees and forensic accountant costs. The hearing on Andi’s RFO commenced on June 12, 2018, and continued on portions of seven court days scattered over thirteen months. The hearing featured extensive evidence of the parties’ finances and testimony from both sides’ forensic accountants. On July 11, 2019, the trial court issued a detailed ruling on submitted matter. The court made the following factual findings: “[Robert], age 73 years, is a high earner business man/investor; in 1984, [Robert] founded O’Hill Capital and serves as its General Partner; [Robert] (individually) has a 30% percent ownership interest. [Robert] and O’Hill Capital own fractional interests in a vast number of investments, including golf courses, strip malls, and many other improved and unimproved properties. O’Hill Capital’s investments are numerous and diverse, and O’Hill Capital has many business partners. See trial exhibit 505,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.