People v. Aparicio CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant and appellant Jacqueline Aparicio appeals the sentence imposed after
this court affirmed her judgment of conviction, vacated her sentence in part, and
remanded the matter for resentencing. Appointed counsel has filed a brief under the
authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, requesting this court to conduct an
independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on
appeal. In addition, defendant has had an opportunity to file a supplemental brief with
this court and has not done so. After reviewing the record, we find no arguable error that
would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant and affirm.
II.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Defendant and 10 cohorts believed a residential property had a large amount of
cocaine and decided to burgle it around 3:00 a.m. They all wore ski masks and some of
them carried guns, one of which was an AK-47. Defendant was supposed to be the
lookout, but she ended up taking items from the property. (Aparicio I, supra, E077421.)
A.N. lived in the “side house” on the property with her nine-year-old daughter.