Victor Walkingeagle v. Google, LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 3, 202423-35465California1,057 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 3 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VICTOR WALKINGEAGLE; NATHAN No. 23-35465 BRIGGS; and DONALD MOLINA, on behalf of themselves and all others D.C. No. 3:22-cv-00763-MO similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

GOOGLE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company DBA Youtube; and YOUTUBE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted September 13, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and COLLINS,** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Raner Collins, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. Victor Walkingeagle, Nathan Briggs, and Donald Molina (collectively,

“Appellants”) appeal the grant of Google, LLC, and YouTube, LLC’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.