Carrillo Martinez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 3, 202423-3397California841 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 3 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMALIA CARRILLO MARTINEZ; No. 23-3397

ALEJANDRO COVARRUBIAS JACOBO;

MARICELA COVARRUBIAS CARRILLO; Agency Nos. A205-253-143

ALONSO VASQUEZ COVARRUBIAS; A205-253-144

A205-253-147

Petitioners, A205-253-148 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 11, 2024** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: RAWLINSON and COLLINS, Circuit Judges, and FITZWATER, *** District Judge.

Petitioners Maricela Covarrubias Carrillo; her adult parents, Alejandro

Covarrubias Jacobo and Amalia Carrillo Martinez; and her minor son, Alonso

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See FED. R. APP. P. 34(a)(2)(C). *** The Honorable Sidney A. Fitzwater, United States District Judge for the Northern…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.