Carlos Barbosa-Paura v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 4, 202420-71166California1,036 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS MARIO BARBOSA-PAURA, Nos. 20-71166 20-73460 Petitioner, Agency No.

A200-902-427

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 2, 2024**

Before: BYBEE and OWENS, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF, District Judge.***

Carlos Mario Barbosa-Paura, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review from the decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his

application for cancellation of removal and his motion to reopen his application for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.