People v. Hudson CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 4, 2024C099531California3,186 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/4/24 P. v. Hudson CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Placer) ----

THE PEOPLE, C099531

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 62185828)

v.

DAVID EUGENE HUDSON, SR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

A jury convicted defendant David Eugene Hudson, Sr., of driving under the influence (DUI) of a controlled substance and causing injury. Defendant claims the trial court abused its discretion, in violation of his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation, by excluding evidence, which defendant claims he would have used to impeach the credibility of the prosecution’s drug recognition expert. We conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion or violate defendant’s constitutional rights. We will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.