Indirect Purchaser v. Toshiba Corporation

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 7, 202422-16534California1,041 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 7 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) No. 22-16534

ANTITRUST LITIGATION,

D.C. No. 4:07-cv-05944-JST ------------------------------

INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS, MEMORANDUM*

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

COOPER & KIRKHAM, P.C.,

Appellant,

v.

TOSHIBA CORPORATION; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jon S. Tigar, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted September 24, 2024 San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: W. FLETCHER and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and KATZMANN,** Judge.

Appellant Cooper & Kirkham, P.C. (“C&K”), counsel for certain indirect

purchasers of cathode ray tubes in a long-outstanding multidistrict antitrust

litigation, appeals the district court’s September 27, 2022, order awarding

attorneys’ fees following a settlement between defendant manufacturers and

indirect…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.