Irvine Ranch Water Dist. v. Orange County Water Dist. CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 7, 2024B329089California8,975 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

A. Pertinent Provisions of the Orange County Water District Act “To maintain an adequate level of groundwater in its territory and protect groundwater quality, [OCWD] acquires water from various sources at its own expense and discharges it

1 The uncodified Act is Chapter 40 of the Water Code Appendix. Undesignated section references that follow are to the Act as reprinted in West’s Annotated California Water Code Appendix.

3 from [OCWD] facilities in Orange County. This process replenishes or ‘recharges’ groundwater in the [Basin]. . . . [¶] . . . [¶] [OCWD’s] recharge activities effectively store water in the groundwater basin, but [OCWD] does not itself use or extract groundwater. Other entities, such as [Irvine Ranch], operate extraction wells and produce water for public drinking water supplies and for other uses.” (Orange Co. Water Dist. v. Sabic Innovative Plastics US, LLC (2017) 14 Cal.App.5th 343, 358-359.) Irvine Ranch and similar entities are therefore often referred to as “producers” of water.2 (Wat. Code, § 60021.) As we shall discuss in more detail, producers collectively pump the majority of their water from the Basin, but they also rely on other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.