Belna
Belna v. Rutan & Tucker LLP CA2/3
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 10/7/24 Belna v. Rutan & Tucker LLP CA2/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
JAMES M. BELNA, B336127
Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 22STCV22179) v.
RUTAN & TUCKER LLP,
Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Stephanie M. Bowick, Judge. Affirmed. James M. Belna, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Loeb & Loeb and W. Allan Edmiston for Defendant and Respondent.
_________________________ Plaintiff James M. Belna appeals from a judgment of dismissal following a successful demurrer to his complaint brought by defendant Rutan & Tucker LLP (Rutan). He contends the complaint alleges sufficient facts to support his claim that…