Belna

Belna v. Rutan & Tucker LLP CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 7, 2024B336127California4,067 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/7/24 Belna v. Rutan & Tucker LLP CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

JAMES M. BELNA, B336127

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 22STCV22179) v.

RUTAN & TUCKER LLP,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Stephanie M. Bowick, Judge. Affirmed. James M. Belna, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Loeb & Loeb and W. Allan Edmiston for Defendant and Respondent.

_________________________ Plaintiff James M. Belna appeals from a judgment of dismissal following a successful demurrer to his complaint brought by defendant Rutan & Tucker LLP (Rutan). He contends the complaint alleges sufficient facts to support his claim that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.