Meza Diaz v. Garland

Good Law
129 F.4th 546
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 8, 202423-973California5,604 words

Opinion

Opinion

Paez, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRISEYDA MEZA DIAZ; No. 23-973

GABRIELA SEGUNDO MEZA,

Agency Nos.

A209-390-110

Petitioners,

A209-390-111

v.

OPINION

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 18, 2024* Pasadena, California

Filed October 8, 2024

Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Richard A. Paez, and Gabriel P. Sanchez, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Paez

* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). SUMMARY **

Immigration

The panel granted Briseyda Meza Diaz’s petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming the denial of asylum and withholding of removal, holding that the record evidence compelled the conclusion that Meza Diaz experienced past persecution committed by forces that Mexican authorities are either unable or unwilling to control, and that the BIA legally erred by failing to consider highly probative evidence regarding a nexus between the harm and a protected ground. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.