United States v. Christopher Millican

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 8, 202422-10336California1,798 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 8 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10336 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:20-CR-00040-1-DAD-BAM-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

CHRISTOPHER JEORGE MILLICAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted September 12, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: BYBEE, BEA, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Christopher Millican appeals his conviction and 570-month sentence for

sexual exploitation of a minor and receipt of visual depictions of a minor engaged in

sexually explicit conduct. We have jurisdiction to review Millican’s conviction and

sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. For the following reasons, we affirm in part

and vacate and remand in part.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1. Millican argues that his confession should have been suppressed

because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.