Rojo-German

United States v. Rojo-German

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 8, 202423-289California607 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 8 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-289 D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 4:21-cr-01597-RM-LCK-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

EFREN ALEXIS ROJO-GERMAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 15, 2024** Submission Vacated August 15, 2024 Resubmitted October 8, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: GRABER, CALLAHAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Efren Alexis Rojo-German appeals his sentence on the ground that his due

process rights were violated when the district court failed to pronounce certain

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). discretionary conditions of supervised release in his presence. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Because Rojo-German…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.