People v. Franklin CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 9, 2024C100137California1,206 words

Opinion

Opinion

Krause, J.

Filed 10/9/24 P. v. Franklin CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C100137

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 69957)

v.

TIMOTHY PRINCE FRANKLIN,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Timothy Prince Franklin appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for resentencing, purportedly brought under Penal Code section 1170.18,1 and Assembly Bill No. 600 (2023-2024 Reg. Sess.) (Assembly Bill No. 600) (Stats. 2023, ch. 446). Defendant’s appellate counsel filed a brief raising no arguable issues under People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.

Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.

1 Defendant filed a supplemental brief raising numerous…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.