Laszloffy
Laszloffy v. City of Big Bear Lake CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff and appellant John Laszloffy (petitioner) filed a petition for writ of
mandate asserting ten causes of action against defendants and respondents City of Big
Bear Lake and City Council for City of Big Bear Lake (collectively the City). The prayer
for relief as to each cause of action sought a writ directing the City to take action to
improve and maintain a street commonly known as Switzerland Drive. The trial court
entered judgment in favor of the City after sustaining two demurrers which, collectively,
disposed of all causes of action asserted by petitioner. Petitioner appeals, arguing the
trial court erred in sustaining the demurrers to his petitions. Upon our independent
review of the allegations asserted in the petitions, we find no error and affirm the
judgment.
II. BACKGROUND
A. Amended Petition and Initial Demurrer
On July 8, 2021, petitioner filed a petition for writ of mandate against the City.
On August 30, 2021, petitioner filed an amended petition. According to the amended
petition, petitioner is a resident living on a street commonly known as Switzerland Drive,
located within the geographical boundaries of the City. Switzerland…