Laszloffy

Laszloffy v. City of Big Bear Lake CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 9, 2024E081763California5,242 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff and appellant John Laszloffy (petitioner) filed a petition for writ of

mandate asserting ten causes of action against defendants and respondents City of Big

Bear Lake and City Council for City of Big Bear Lake (collectively the City). The prayer

for relief as to each cause of action sought a writ directing the City to take action to

improve and maintain a street commonly known as Switzerland Drive. The trial court

entered judgment in favor of the City after sustaining two demurrers which, collectively,

disposed of all causes of action asserted by petitioner. Petitioner appeals, arguing the

trial court erred in sustaining the demurrers to his petitions. Upon our independent

review of the allegations asserted in the petitions, we find no error and affirm the

judgment.

II. BACKGROUND

A. Amended Petition and Initial Demurrer

On July 8, 2021, petitioner filed a petition for writ of mandate against the City.

On August 30, 2021, petitioner filed an amended petition. According to the amended

petition, petitioner is a resident living on a street commonly known as Switzerland Drive,

located within the geographical boundaries of the City. Switzerland…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.