Martinez Gonzalez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 10, 202423-1834California394 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 10 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VICTOR MARTINEZ GONZALEZ, No. 23-1834 Agency No. Petitioner, A036-164-011 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 8, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Victor H. Martinez Gonzalez petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reopen. We deny the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in finding that the changed country

conditions exception in 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(ii) did not apply and that

Martinez’s motion was therefore time-barred under 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.