Planned Parenthood Federation v. Center for Medical Progress

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 11, 202421-15124California1,149 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 11 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION No. 21-15124 OF AMERICA, INC.; et al., D.C. No. 3:16-cv-00236-WHO Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v. MEMORANDUM*

CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS; et al.,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Horsley Orrick, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 9, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: KOH and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and SIMON,*** District Judge.

Defendants-Appellants Center for Medical Progress, BioMax Procurement

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Michael H. Simon, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. Services, LLC, David Daleiden, Gerardo Adrian Lopez, Albin Rhomberg,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.