Anderson
Anderson v. Perez
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 11 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KEITH ANDERSON; LORENA No. 23-2790 MCCAIGUE, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-04290-JAK-GJS Plaintiffs - Appellees,
v. MEMORANDUM*
Chief JOHN E. PEREZ; CITY OF
PASADENA,
Defendants - Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John A. Kronstadt, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted September 9, 2024 Pasadena, California
Before: R. NELSON, MILLER, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Keith Anderson and Lorena McCaigue (the Andersons) are federal law
enforcement officers. Claiming that the City of Pasadena and Police Chief John E.
Perez (the Appellants) retaliated against them for their First Amendment protected
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. activity, the Andersons asserted several causes of action, including under