People v. Perkins CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 14, 2024C099324California2,937 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/14/24 P. v. Perkins CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C099324

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 12F01436)

v.

DANTE PERKINS,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Dante Perkins appeals from a resentencing order made under Penal Code section 1172.75.1 Defendant had moved for dismissal of various enhancements included in his aggregate sentence of 35 years eight months in state prison. At

Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.

1 resentencing, the trial court dismissed a one-year prior prison term enhancement made invalid by amendments to section 667.5, subdivision (b), as well as two firearm enhancements under the amendments to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.