Michael Mogan v. William Hendricks

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 16, 202423-55691California887 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 16 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL MOGAN, No. 23-55691

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00140-FMO-PD v.

WILLIAM HENDRICKS; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando M. Olguin, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 11, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Michael Mogan appeals the district court’s order granting the motions of

William Hendricks, Roxanne Hendricks, Kathrin Wanner, and Kirsten Miller

(collectively, “Appellees”) to strike his complaint under California’s Anti-Strategic

Lawsuits Against Public Participation (“anti-SLAPP”) statute, Cal. Civ. Proc. Code

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.