Alejandro Moreno Norzagaray v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 16, 202420-70779California1,170 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 16 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALEJANDRO MORENO No. 20-70779, No. 20-73155

NORZAGARAY,

Agency No. A200-602-815 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 11, 2024**

Before: BYBEE and OWENS, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Alejandro Moreno Norzagaray, a citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of two decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”): (1) an order

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. affirming the denial by the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) of petitioner’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.