Alberto Poggio v. United States Office of Personnel Management

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 16, 202423-55685California527 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 16 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALBERTO VINCENT POGGIO, No. 23-55685

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:20-cv-02115-CJC-ADS v.

UNITED STATES OFFICE OF MEMORANDUM*

PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 11, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Alberto Poggio appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to enforce

the court’s order and final judgment against the United States Office of Personnel

Management (“OPM”) in a suit brought under the Administrative Procedure Act

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 701 et. seq. We have jurisdiction under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.