Silva Franco v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 16, 202423-4014California615 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 16 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JHONATAS AMORIM SILVA No. 23-4014 FRANCO; GISLAINE FRANCO Agency Nos.

VALADARES AMORIM; BENHOUR A220-251-770

FRANCO VALADARES A220-251-771

AMORIM; ARTHUR FRANCO

A220-251-772

VALADARES AMORIM,

A220-251-773

Petitioners,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 7, 2024** Las Vegas, Nevada

Before: BEA, CHRISTEN, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Jhonatas Amorim Silva Franco and Gislaine Franco Valadares

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Amorim, and their two minor children, who are all natives and citizens of Brazil,

petition for review of the Board of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.