Pichinte Henriquez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 16, 202424-85California502 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 16 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELIAS ISMAEL PICHINTE No. 24-85 HENRIQUEZ; INGRID JEANETH Agency Nos.

ACOSTA YGLESIAS; LIAM ISMAEL A208-133-433

PICHINTE ACOSTA, A220-146-598

A220-146-599

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 11, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Elias Ismael Pichinte Henriquez, his wife Ingrid Jeaneth Acosta Yglesias, and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). their minor child (collectively, “Pichinte”), natives and citizens of El Salvador,

petition for review of a decision by the Board…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.