Pichinte Henriquez v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 16, 202424-85California502 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 16 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ELIAS ISMAEL PICHINTE No. 24-85 HENRIQUEZ; INGRID JEANETH Agency Nos.
ACOSTA YGLESIAS; LIAM ISMAEL A208-133-433
PICHINTE ACOSTA, A220-146-598
A220-146-599
Petitioners,
v. MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 11, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Elias Ismael Pichinte Henriquez, his wife Ingrid Jeaneth Acosta Yglesias, and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). their minor child (collectively, “Pichinte”), natives and citizens of El Salvador,
petition for review of a decision by the Board…