Medrano-De Martinez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 16, 202423-2602California671 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 16 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANA VITALINA MEDRANO-DE No. 23-2602 MARTINEZ; ANA PATRICIA Agency Nos.

MARTINEZ-MEDRANO; KAREN A208-914-892

ADRIANA MARTINEZ- A209-283-634

MEDRANO; ALISON VALERIA

A209-283-633

MARTINEZ-MEDRANO,

A209-283-635

Petitioners,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 11, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: KOH and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and SIMON, District Judge.***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Michael H. Simon, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. Ana Vitalina Medrano-De Martinez and her minor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.