People v. Taylor CA4/1

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks the court to review the record for error. To assist the court in its review, and in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel has identified three possible issues that were considered in evaluating the potential merits of this appeal: 1. Whether the court abused its discretion in imposing conditions of probation. 2. Whether the minute order granting probation should be amended to conform with the oral pronouncement of the order. 3. Whether the probation issues are now moot because the court terminated probation when it sentenced Taylor to prison.

2 We have reviewed the record for error as required by Wende and Anders. We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Taylor on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, J.

WE CONCUR:

McCONNELL, P. J.

CASTILLO, J.

3